Phalaris arundinacea (Reed Canary Grass)

Plant Info
Also known as: Reed Canarygrass
Family:Poaceae (Grass)
Life cycle:perennial
Origin:Europe/native hybrid
  • Invasive - ERADICATE!
Habitat:part shade, sun; any moist soil; wetlands, fields, woods
Fruiting season:late spring to early summer
Plant height:2 to 5 feet
Wetland Indicator Status:GP: FACW MW: FACW NCNE: FACW

Pick an image for a larger view. See the glossary for icon descriptions.

Detailed Information

Flower: Flower shape: indistinct Cluster type: panicle Cluster type: spike

[photo of flowers] The grasshead can be 3 to 8 inches long, densly clustered spikelets on ½ to 1½ inch branches. Color is green, turning purplish, and upon maturity the seed heads collapse tightly against the stem, to roughly 3/8 inch wide, and take on a pale bleached tan color.

Leaves and stem: Leaf attachment: alternate Leaf type: simple

[photo of leaves] The grass stem (the culm) is smooth, simple (no branches) and erect. The blades are up to 10 inches long and ¾ inch wide. The grass blades have a long sheath at their base that encloses the stem and are less than half the length of the internodes. Blades are smooth and the entire upper vegetative portion of this species fades to a pale, bleached tan that is diagnostic in the dormant season identification.


This is perhaps the single most destructive, invasive wetland species in Minnesota to date. One of its field identifying characteristics is that it is so everywhere! The stems and leaves eventually collapse into a sprawling mat that is difficult to traverse by humans and wildlife alike and is essentially useless for nesting habitat. Developed by university and other crop “improvement” plant breeders, the introduction of foreign genotypes into our native reed canarygrass populations has produced a robust species indeed. Touted as a wet meadow hay crop and soil nutrient management tool, it is an exceedingly toxic pill for limited returns. While it may share some space for Canada thistle, perennial sowthistle and little else, its dense stands, voracious root systems and persistent seed bank make it a resource manager's nightmare. Though it has limited commercial seed production in Minnesota it is widely distributed throughout Minnesota, the US and the world.

Please visit our sponsors

  • Minnesota Native Plant Society

Where to buy native seed and plants ↓

Map of native plant purveyors in the upper midwest

  • Prairie Restorations - Bringing people together with the land
  • Shop for native seeds and plants at!
  • Shooting Star Native Seeds - Native Prairie Grass and Wildflower Seeds
  • Morning Sky Greenery - Native Prairie Plants
  • Minnesota Native Landscapes - Your Ecological Problem Solvers

More photos

Photos courtesy Peter M. Dziuk and K. Chayka, taken at various locations in MN--it's everywhere!


Have you seen this plant in Minnesota, or have any other comments about it?

Posted by: John Moriarty, Ramsey County Parks
on: 2009-12-28 09:58:05

My feeling about reed canary is that it has a strong foothold in many wetlands and control of it in large wetlands is currently impossible. The best way to work with rcg is to try to control small isolated patches and to make sure it isn't spread into non-infested sites. The continued planting of this plant makes control of rcg even harder. I have a hard time supporting expensive revegetation projects in rcg dominated wetlands complexes because rcg will reinvade rapidly.

Posted by: Dave Crawford, DNR retired
on: 2010-01-22 16:33:07

The comment "so everywhere!" in the notes is so true! Seeing reed canary grass occupying stream and lake edges, wetlands, even damp parts of otherwise dry prairies, and continuing to expand into healthy, wildlife-rich habitat, is a heartbreak. Knowing the superb diversity of native, non-cultivar species which is present before reed canary takes hold, it's discouraging to see that diversity disappear. Prevention is better than cure, in my mind. Prevent establishment of reed canary wherever possible, and eliminate starter populations while they're still manageable, as John says. The invasiveness of reed canary exceeds that of the well-known purple loosestrife. Control of reed canary is crippled because reed canary isn't a prohibited species, so there is no regulation to prevent new infestations. Also, while successful biocontrol has been developed for purple loosestrife, since reed canary is still legal to plant, no biocontrol has been or is likely to be developed.

A Wisconsin ecological restoration specialist, who had been doing prairie restoration in the Madison Wisconsin area for decades when I talked with him in the 90s, said that, if he seeded natives and burned reed canary aggressively, he could get a few plants of native species to start to show up after 10 or 12 years of effort. He considered that effort worthwhile, but it paints a good picture of how uphill the battle is. A former colleague attempted to establish natives on a site clogged with reed canary, and had next to no success even with diligent efforts. On my Wisconsin property, wherever there's rcg, there's nothing else, not even cattails, and they're considered invasive in their own right.

Posted by: Tyler - Western MN
on: 2010-05-23 23:15:03

The only way I have heard of control working is with high intensity early spring and late fall grazing, during the active growing season. repeated defoliation during initial and regrowth, then resting while natives have a chance to establish is the best, and it will still take years. A great example of this is to look at native rangelands in northeast south dakota that have had good grazing management for many years. You will find very little RCG and lots of native sedges meadows and cordgrass.

Posted by: Diana - NE Mpls
on: 2011-08-07 15:32:31

I've planted native, including grasses & sedges, on my front slope. I'm also pulling up every grass I can't identify, erring on the side of pulling something I've planted - just so I'm sure to have only native grasses and sedges. Can you tell me whether this grass has a leaf that, when you run your fingers flat against it toward the stem, the edges have just a bit of a saw-tooth? Nothing visible, and nothing that hurts - just a bit of resistance, and only when drawing toward the stem. Thanks. (I've already pulled it out, just in case!)

Posted by: K. Chayka
on: 2011-08-07 21:49:51

Diana, I don't know if it does, or if it does, whether that would be an identifying trait. I suspect many other grasses might have a similar texture on the leaf edges.

Posted by: John - Newfolden, MN
on: 2011-08-30 21:55:09

Two local farmers told me that canary grass is good feed if you can get it before it "heads." However, they said that getting it timely is difficult as it is often in wet areas that are problematic to get into or work in.

Posted by: Bill Bartodziej, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District
on: 2012-01-18 13:52:18

We have had success controlling reed canary grass along certain lakeshores and wetlands. Soil nitrogen seems to be a factor. In sandy-granular soils with low N levels, we have been able to establish diverse native plant communities under reasonable management protocols. See Ecological Restoration (2011) 29:329-331 for a summary [ed. note: pdf available on the web site].

Posted by: max - stillwater washington county
on: 2012-02-22 14:21:04

it as a some what high DMT content in the hole plant

Posted by: Izzy - washington
on: 2012-03-14 10:51:17

John, Reed Canary grass is toxic to live stock do to its many alkaloids DMT, gramine,5-MeO-DMT and hordenine

Posted by: Ken - Washington County
on: 2012-07-22 10:15:50

What is the best way for a layperson (non-botanist, farmer, horticulturist, etc.) to get rid of RDC?

Posted by: K. Chayka
on: 2012-07-22 16:09:02

Ken, the Wisconsin DNR has some suggested mechanical and chemical treatments on their RCG page that you might try.

Posted by: Jason - Mankato, Blue Earth County
on: 2013-07-26 23:28:14

Indian Lake Conservation Area

Posted by: Julie - Sibley County
on: 2013-08-30 10:02:44

Actually, reed canarygrass can be a great option for forage for livestock. The alkaloids are not toxic, but definitely reduce palatability. Researchers are working on developing varieties with fewer alkaloids, to increase palatability and quality for livestock feed. It can be a good way to utilize farmland that is lower-lying. For more info, please see this U of MN Extension bulletin:

Posted by: K. Chayka
on: 2013-08-30 11:49:54

Julie, we don't think there is ANY good use for RCG. It's a highly aggressive invasive species that CANNOT be contained to somebody's farmland. I cannot believe there are no other forage options.

Posted by: Christine - St. Louis Park
on: 2015-05-31 04:36:32

I found some tall grass growing spontaneously in the wild area of my parents property in the Minnetonka Mills area. It is consistently about 5' high, and makes a good screen. The root/rhizome(?) is fleshy and pink like the roots of the decorative ribbon grass. I don't remember seeing this tall grass while I was growing up, but then I wasn't paying attention. Does it seem likely I have found reed canary grass?

Posted by: K. Chayka
on: 2015-05-31 09:29:10

Christine, RCG is absolutely everywhere, so yes, it is very likely

Posted by: Linda Quammen
on: 2016-05-28 23:21:56

Well, I finally got here. After 4+ years of pulling Garlic mustard, Queen Anne's Lace, Japanese Hedge Parsley, Spotted Knapweed and more from spring to frost I may be seeing the forest instead of the trees. The past couple years I've noticed the grasses are encroaching everywhere--woodland, lakeshore, prairie. Mainly one grass so I came here and confirmed what I didn't want to know--reed canary grass.

In the parks where I volunteer my time pulling (as do many others) there is no attempt to eradicate or even mitigate (or talk about) reed canary grass anyplace other than on lakeshores. So, given that there is little physical support other than a very limited number of volunteers, should we volunteers stop pulling all other invasives and start pulling rcg? Can we actually pull it--at least where it is just a series of small infestations? And, shouldn't some of that Legacy Amendment money be going toward removal of an invasive that will change our ecosystems and whole landscape? How do we get groups talking about the elephant in the room?

Posted by: K. Chayka
on: 2016-05-29 09:07:41

Linda, I wish we had an answer for you, or this was a good forum to have the kind of discussion you desire. Nobody with the power to do anything significant (such as the MN Weed Advisory group) is listening, or their ears are plugged up by the industry and the MN Crop Improvement Assn. Depending on where you are, your county Soil and Water Conservation district might have some thoughts on the subject, or maybe provide some assistance. I wish you luck.

Post a comment

Note: All comments are moderated before posting to keep the riff-raff out. An email address is required, but will not be posted—it will only be used for information exchange between the 2 of us (if needed) and will never be given to a 3rd party without your express permission.

For info on subjects other than plant identification (gardening, invasive species control, edible plants, etc.), please check the links and invasive species pages for additional resources.


Note: Comments or information about plants outside of Minnesota and neighboring states may not be posted because Id like to keep the focus of this web site centered on Minnesota. Thanks for your understanding.